Governance Philosophy
Decentralized Governance Model: Centrix operates under a community-governed framework where token holders exercise direct voting power over protocol upgrades, treasury allocation, and strategic initiatives. No central authority controls the network.
Core Principles
Decentralized Decision Making
All major decisions voted on by token holders
Transparent Processes
All proposals, votes, and reasoning publicly visible
Meritocratic Participation
Voting power proportional to stake and participation
Community Sovereignty
Community can override any team decision
Governance Structure
Governance Tiers
Tier 1: Community Governance
Tier 1: Community Governance
Who: CXT token holders (10+ CXT required)Voting Power: 1 CXT = 1 voteDecision Rights:
- Protocol upgrades and parameters
- Treasury allocation (protocol fees)
- Core team compensation
- Roadmap prioritization
- Proposal submitted to community forum
- 7-day discussion and refinement period
- Formal on-chain vote (7 days voting window)
- 50% quorum, 66% approval required
- 2-day timelock for execution
Tier 2: Core Team Operations
Tier 2: Core Team Operations
Who: Centrix core development teamDecision Rights:
- Daily operational decisions
- Development priorities within approved roadmap
- Partnership negotiations
- Security incident response
- Must operate within community-approved budget
- Quarterly transparency reports to community
- Subject to community vote override
Tier 3: Technical Committees
Tier 3: Technical Committees
Groups:
- Protocol Committee (5-7 core devs)
- Security Committee (3-5 experts)
- Economics Committee (3-5 researchers)
- Propose changes to respective areas
- Provide technical expertise to community
- Implement community-approved decisions
Proposal Types
Emergency Proposals
- Voting Period: 1 day (instead of 7)
- Approval Required: 75% (instead of 66%)
- Timelock: None (immediate execution)
- Requires: 3 out of 5 core team members + emergency review
- Critical security vulnerability response
- Network-threatening consensus failure
- Catastrophic economic parameters
Standard Proposals
Timeline: 14 days total- Days 1-7: Community discussion
- Days 8-14: On-chain voting
- Parameter changes (fees, stakes, timeouts)
- New feature adoption
- Protocol upgrades
- Budget allocation
- Strategic partnerships
Constitutional Amendments
Changes to governance itself- Voting Period: 14 days
- Approval Required: 75% (supermajority)
- Timelock: 7 days (for reflection)
- Core security mechanisms
- One-token-one-vote principle
- Community emergency veto power
Voting Mechanics
Delegation Model
Token holders can:- Vote directly on proposals
- Delegate voting power to trusted representatives
- Change delegation at any time
- Vote on individual proposals even if delegated
Vote Types
Yes/No Voting
Simple binary choice on proposals
Quadratic Voting
Cost to vote increases quadratically (prevents whale dominance)
Ranked Choice
Choose preference order (used for multi-option decisions)
Conviction Voting
Voting power increases with lock-up duration
Anti-Gaming Measures
Voting Power Snapshot
Voting power determined at block height when proposal submitted, not current block
Flash Loan Protection
Blocks voting with borrowed tokens on same transaction
Vote Escrow (veTokens)
Lock tokens for 1-4 years to increase voting power
Quorum Requirements
Minimum participation needed for valid vote (50% for critical changes)
Treasury Management
Revenue Sources
- 2-5% protocol fees on all compute transactions
- Slashing penalties from fraudulent providers
- Strategic partnership revenue
- Grant programs and partnerships
Allocation Framework
Development
40% - Core development and infrastructure
Community Grants
30% - Ecosystem builders and researchers
Marketing
20% - Adoption and awareness
Reserves
10% - Strategic reserves and contingencies
Community Grant Program
Purpose
Purpose
Fund projects that advance Centrix ecosystemExample Categories:
- Developer tools and integrations
- Research and protocol improvements
- Educational content and tutorials
- Community events and marketing
Application Process
Application Process
- Submit detailed proposal with budget
- Community discussion (7 days)
- Grants committee review
- Token holder vote
- Milestone-based funding release
Grant Sizes
Grant Sizes
- Micro ($1K-5K): Rapid approval process
- Standard ($5K-50K): Full review process
- Major ($50K+): Extended vetting and milestones
Dispute Resolution
Arbitration Process
When users disagree on task completion or payment:Step 1: Direct Negotiation
Step 1: Direct Negotiation
Parties attempt to resolve directly (3-day period)
Step 2: Arbitration Committee
Step 2: Arbitration Committee
If no resolution:
- Randomly select 5 CXT holders as arbitrators
- Review evidence from both parties
- Vote on outcome (majority rule)
- 7-day resolution window
Step 3: Community Appeal
Step 3: Community Appeal
If party unsatisfied:
- Can appeal to full token holder governance
- Full discussion and vote required
- Final decision binding
Arbitrator Requirements
- ✅ Hold minimum 100 CXT
- ✅ Complete dispute resolution training
- ✅ Maintain good reputation score
- ✅ Receive compensation for participation
- ✅ Subject to slashing for misconduct
Roadmap
Q1 2026
Launch community governance on testnet
Q2 2026
Mainnet governance with limited scope
Q3 2026
Full governance control of protocol
Q4 2026
Autonomous governance without team veto
Getting Involved
Discuss Proposals
Participate in governance forum discussions
Vote on Changes
Vote on proposals affecting the network
Delegate Power
Delegate your votes to trusted community members
Run for Committee
Apply to join technical and governance committees
A strong, engaged community is Centrix’s greatest strength. Your participation in governance matters.

