Skip to main contentThe current cloud computing paradigm, while revolutionary when introduced, has evolved into a system that increasingly serves provider interests over user needs.
Monopolistic Market Structure
Three providers control 66% of the global cloud market:
- AWS: 32% market share
- Azure: 23% market share
- GCP: 11% market share
This oligopoly enables:
- Arbitrary pricing with 30-50% profit margins
- Lack of price competition in many regions
- Coordinated pricing strategies across providers
- Barriers to market entry for new competitors
Result: Customers have limited alternatives and face continuous price increases.
Vendor Lock-In
Cloud providers deliberately create switching costs through:
- Proprietary APIs incompatible with competitors
- Specialized services that don’t exist elsewhere
- Data egress fees making migration expensive
- Training and expertise tied to specific platforms
Result: Customers become captive to their initial choice, even as better alternatives emerge.
Resource Inefficiency
Current estimates suggest:
- 85% of global computing capacity is idle at any given time
- $100B+ in unused hardware value depreciates annually
- Massive environmental cost from underutilized data centers
- Capital waste as hardware sits unused while new capacity is built
Result: Enormous waste of both capital and environmental resources.
Access Inequality
Centralized cloud creates geographic and economic barriers:
- Limited presence in developing regions
- High latency from distant data centers
- Expensive pricing prohibitive for small users
- Payment barriers (credit cards, enterprise contracts)
Result: Innovation and economic opportunities concentrated in wealthy regions.
Privacy and Control Concerns
Users must trust centralized providers with:
- Sensitive data processed on provider hardware
- Proprietary algorithms running on provider infrastructure
- Compliance with unknown internal policies
- Government access via legal compulsion
Result: Loss of control and potential privacy breaches.
The Opportunity
These problems create a clear opportunity for a decentralized alternative that can:
- ✅ Enable competitive pricing through open markets
- ✅ Prevent vendor lock-in with portable workloads
- ✅ Maximize resource utilization globally
- ✅ Democratize access to computational power
- ✅ Restore user control and privacy